Peer Review Process
Dinamika: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Keislaman applies a double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, relevance, and academic integrity of submitted manuscripts. The identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process to maintain objectivity and ethical standards.
Stages of the Peer Review Process
|
Stage |
Description |
|
1. Manuscript Submission |
Authors submit their manuscripts through the journal’s online submission system (OJS). |
|
2. Initial Screening |
The Editor-in-Chief or assigned editor evaluates the manuscript’s relevance to the journal’s focus and scope, compliance with author guidelines, completeness, and originality through a similarity check using Turnitin or an equivalent tool. |
|
3. Double-Blind Peer Review |
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. The identities of authors and reviewers remain confidential. |
|
4. Editorial Decision |
The editor considers the reviewers’ comments and recommendations and communicates the editorial decision to the corresponding author. |
|
5. Manuscript Revision |
Authors revise their manuscripts in response to reviewers’ comments and submit the revised version within the deadline specified by the editorial team. |
|
6. Further Evaluation |
Revised manuscripts may be returned to the original reviewers or evaluated by the editor to determine whether the requested revisions have been adequately addressed. |
|
7. Final Decision |
The editorial team makes the final decision based on the reviewers’ recommendations, manuscript quality, and compliance with the journal’s standards. |
|
8. Copyediting and Publication |
Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting, proofreading, layout preparation, metadata verification, and publication in the journal’s designated issue. |
Editorial Decisions
|
Decision |
Description |
|
Accept Submission |
The manuscript meets the journal’s academic and editorial standards and is accepted for publication. |
|
Revisions Required |
The manuscript requires revisions before a final decision can be made. |
|
Resubmit for Review |
Substantial revisions are required, and the revised manuscript must undergo further evaluation. |
|
Resubmit Elsewhere |
The manuscript is not sufficiently aligned with the journal’s focus and scope and may be more suitable for another publication. |
|
Decline Submission |
The manuscript does not meet the journal’s academic, methodological, ethical, or editorial requirements and is rejected. |
|
See Comments |
Further clarification or consideration is required based on the editor’s or reviewers’ comments. |
Peer Review of Referred Papers
For manuscripts referred from other journals or editorial partners, the editorial team may consider existing review reports when determining the next steps. Additional independent reviews may be requested when necessary to ensure that the manuscript meets the academic and editorial standards of Dinamika: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Keislaman.
The final publication decision rests with the editorial team, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations, the manuscript’s academic quality, and its relevance to the journal’s aim and scope.
